| 000 | 01678nam a2200229Ia 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | 7570 | ||
| 005 | 20240930183027.0 | ||
| 008 | 201118s9999||||xx |||||||||||||| ||und|| | ||
| 020 | _a0-521-36835-9 | ||
| 040 |
_cB000 _aCIC-UMAD _bspa |
||
| 041 | _aeng | ||
| 050 |
_aR P299.D43 _bL96 |
||
| 100 |
_aLyons, Christopher _913034 |
||
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aDefiniteness / _cChristopher Lyons |
| 250 | _a1a ed. | ||
| 260 |
_aEUA : _bCambridge, _c1999 |
||
| 300 |
_a380 p. ; _c15 x 22.5 cm |
||
| 490 | _aCambridge textbooks in linguistics | ||
| 520 | _aThis textbook investigates definiteness both from a comparative and a theoretical point of viwe, showing how languages express definiteness and what definiteness is. It surveys a large number of languages to discover the range of variation in relation to definiteness and related gramatical phenomena: demonstratives, possesives, personal pronouns. It outlines work done on the nature of definiteness in semantics, pragmatics and syntax, and develops an account on which definiteness is a grammatical category represented in syntax as a functional head (the widely discussed D). Consideration is also given to the origins and evolution of definite articles in the light of the comparative and theoretical findings. Among the claims advanced are that definiteness does not occur in all languages though the pragmatic concept which it grammaticalizes probably does, that many languages have definiteness in their pronoun system but not elsewhere, that definiteness is not inherent in possessives, and that definiteness is to be assimilated to the grammatical category of person. | ||
| 650 |
_aLingüística _93 _xCerteza |
||
| 942 |
_2lcc _cBK |
||
| 999 |
_c10608 _d10608 |
||